AV - Preeminent Badge
Super Lawyers Badge
Tennessee Association for Justice Badge
Tennesee Bar Association Badge

Courts Refuse to Hold Bar Liable for Injuries Arising from Patron’s Drunk Driving Accident

Law Office of David S. Hagy, PLC

A Tennessee trial court and appellate court each concluded that the family of man killed when a drunk driver plowed into his apartment with her vehicle could not pursue a liability claim against the bar where the woman drank on the night of the accident. Tennessee law imposes clear restrictions on the potential liability of sellers of alcohol. Because the woman who caused the accident received her alcohol as a result of drinks ordered by, and served to, other bar patrons, and did not order, purchase or receive any drinks directly from bar staff, the establishment could not be held liable.

In March 2011, Ms. Langworthy crashed her vehicle into the apartment of Mr. Smith, killing him. Langworthy had a blood alcohol level of more than twice the legal limit at the time of the accident. Smith’s family sued the driver and the bar at which she was drinking that night. After the accumulation of several affidavits, the bar moved for summary judgment. The bar claimed that the drinks the woman consumed inside the bar were all requested, purchased and received by male companions or acquaintances and that the bar’s employees never served Langworthy.

The trial court sided with the bar, granting summary judgment. The court determined that the uncontested evidence showed that Langworthy did not order or pay for alcohol at the bar and the bar’s staff did not directly provide drinks to her.

On appeal, the Tennessee Court of Appeals distilled the case down to whether, as defined by Tenn. Code 57-10-102, the bar “sold” alcohol to Langworthy on the night of accident. That statute permits a jury to find a seller of alcohol liable for personal injuries if the purchaser served was a “visibly intoxicated person.” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. McGinnis, supported their case. The appeals court concluded that the situation in the Temlock case, where the court imposed liability against the seller, was much different than the facts of the current case. The driver in the Temlock case ordered his own beer, paid for his own beer and the bar staff served it directly to him. None of these facts were true with Langworthy, and the family had no proof indicating that the bar sold alcohol to Langworthy, the court decided.

Additionally, the appeals court joined the trial court in rebuffing the Smith family’s request to allow them to pursue their case to create new law that would hold a seller of alcohol liable if it serves a large number of drinks to a single purchaser who then distributes those drinks to other guests at the establishment. Creating such new law would be an improper overreach of judicial authority, the court stated, pointing out that it “is not the role of the courts to modify the General Assembly’s public policy decision by creating ‘new law’ as is sought by” the Smith family.

Whether the decision was correctly decided is arguable, but it certainly is not helpful public policy. Bars should be held liable if they knowingly serve a visibly intoxicated person who they know is going to drive. Excusing the bar from any liability simply because the drinks were actually purchased by other patrons seems to avoid the intent, if not the letter of the statute.

If you’ve been injured by a driver who was intoxicated, distracted or otherwise impaired, get in touch with the Law Office of David S. Hagy, PSC. Our attorneys can help you form a plan to pursue your case and seek the recovery that you deserve.

Reach us online or call (615) 975-7882.

More Blog Posts

Client Reviews

I got into a car accident a couple months ago, and David made the whole insurance process easy to understand. He took away the stress of the situation and I felt comfortable knowing I had someone like him working for my...

Jennie E.

After getting rear ended in auto accident and in back pain David handled my personal injury claim against the at fault driver's insurance company when the large, high profile law firms in town turned me down because they...

Lakin S.

After getting into my first accident, David was a huge help in getting my lawsuit figured out in a timely manner. He was able to explain to me the details of the case so I felt like I was in control of how I wanted to...

Dana P.

While visiting Nashville, my husband and I were in a pretty bad auto accident with our Uber & a tractor trailer on the highway. David was great to work with. He was quite thorough, explaining everything we would come up...

Wendy N.

We have now used David twice. He is very personable, down to earth, hard working and gets to the bottom of your situation quickly. If we are ever in a situation where hes needed, we will use him again. Highly recommend...

Megan l.

This guy, he is the one you want in your corner going against insurance companies. Super nice, and super efficient. I would recommend this guy hands down... and have!

Hastings J.

Get in Touch

Fill out the contact form or call us at (615) 975-7882 to schedule your free initial consultation.
  • Group.svg Free Initial Consultation
  • Group-39.svg 25+ Years of Experience
  • Group-1.svg Millions Recovered

Leave Us a Message